The Union Building, a $25 million redevelopment of an 85,000 square foot, eight-story historic office building with first floor retail. Originally built in 1905, the building is located at 1836 Euclid Avenue in downtown Cleveland, Ohio, on the Cleveland State University campus.

Type:

Office – Historic Renovation

Location:

Cleveland, Ohio

Size:

85,000 s.f., 8-Story Office with First Floor Retail

Our Goal:

To purchase, rehabilitate and own a significant property on or near the campus of Cleveland State University in downtown Cleveland.

Our Challenges and Solutions:

Navigating Complex Financing

  • Challenge: Previous attempts had been made to redevelop the building and the result was a mix of legal and financial problems: The building was in foreclosure with a myriad of liens and other issues, including an incomplete title.
  • Solutions: The base funding was a combination of equity and bond financing made possible by the long-term lease with Cleveland State University. However, to make the project viable and with competitive market rents while restoring the historic characteristics of the building, we secured more than $5 million in combined State of Ohio historic tax credits and federal historic-preservation tax credits.

Building a Team

  • Challenges: We had to earn the trust and cooperation of the bank, the previous ownership group and the lien holders to gain control of the building and guide all parties through the purchase process.
  • Solutions: We enlisted a team of architects and consultants with specialized talents to help prepare the applications and help coordinate the tax credit process. We also maintained a line of regular communication with the state development department, the Department of the Interior, the bank, Cleveland State University and Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED).

Having a Vision

  • Challenges: The existing condition of the building made it tough to envision the outcome of a redevelopment plan. It was vacant for more than six years and the negligence showed in peeling paint, deteriorated floors, broken windows and many other problems. Its systems were antiquated and in some cases not functioning. However, the structure of the building was solid and worth saving and the floor plan was still considered efficient even in today’s standards.